In reply to:
X
@XerifiedNobody
·
226d
Cartoonishly Inept
@CartoonishlyI
·
226d
X
@XerifiedNobody
·
226d
Cartoonishly Inept
@CartoonishlyI
·
226d
X
@XerifiedNobody
·
226d
The statement is part of a public discourse discussing a Supreme Court decision related to social media and government interaction. The tone is factual, aiming to clarify a legal misunderstanding about the court's ruling on standing rather than legality.
- The statement does no harm as it focuses on clarifying a legal point without attacking others. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the legal concept of standing, which can enhance comprehension of the court's decision. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly contributing to a discussion on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.