Reposted by Matt Taibbi
Bastian Barucker
@BBarucker
·
227d
The statement criticizes police actions at a pro-Palestine gathering in Berlin, using charged language like 'Thought Police' and 'wrongspeak' to suggest suppression of free speech. It implies a violation of civil liberties and raises concerns about predictive policing and its impact on fundamental rights.
- The statement uses provocative language that could incite tension, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It raises concerns about privacy and civil liberties, suggesting a violation by authorities. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It attempts to use its platform to highlight perceived societal issues, though in a divisive manner. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It raises issues of free speech and civil liberties, though the language used may undermine responsible discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.