In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
227d
kotkin.bsky.social
@EgorKotkin
·
227d
The statement is part of a broader conversation about the casting of Cynthia Erivo as Jesus in 'Jesus Christ Superstar,' which touches on issues of representation, gender roles, and cultural norms. The tone of the statement is dismissive and challenges the coherence of the previous argument, questioning the rationale behind the casting decision.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of others involved in the discussion.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the previous argument without engaging with its substance. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it questions the coherence of the argument rather than addressing its points. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is a response rather than an original claim.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it does not contribute positively to the discourse.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold free speech principles responsibly, as it dismisses rather than engages with the argument.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.