The statement criticizes Louis DeJoy's tenure as Postmaster General, suggesting his actions have negatively impacted postal workers and communities. It calls for a new Postmaster General who values the USPS as a public service. The tone is critical and calls for change, engaging with public issues related to the USPS and its leadership.
- The statement could be seen as harmful to Louis DeJoy by labeling him as incompetent, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of the need for a Postmaster General who supports the USPS as a public good, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion for postal workers and communities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of DeJoy's performance but does not engage in personal attacks beyond labeling him as incompetent, which is a borderline ad hominem argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a change in leadership for the betterment of the USPS and society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion on a public figure's performance, using the platform responsibly to discuss public service issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.