The statement comments on the impact of political threats on tourism in Florida, suggesting skepticism about their effectiveness. It implies that despite calls for boycotts, tourism remains strong.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses concerns about boycotts, which could be seen as minimizing the issues prompting them.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy towards those who might feel threatened or concerned, focusing instead on tourism statistics. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but dismisses the potential impact of political actions on tourism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.