Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement criticizes the allocation of a large government grant, suggesting it is a misuse of taxpayer money. It contrasts this with the financial struggles of small charities, businesses, and families, implying a misalignment of priorities.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting misuse of taxpayer money, but it does not directly harm individuals. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the integrity of the grant process, potentially affecting the dignity of those involved, but does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is critical and accusatory, lacking constructive dialogue or evidence to support its claims. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.