Christopher C. Cuomo

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score -13
2/20/2025, 2:56:13 PM
X
In reply to:
Ms CorreyKelly
@MissCoelan
·
283d
@tify330 @ChrisCuomo We're not going to take political advice from someone who equated being called "Fredo" the same as being called the n-word. He's not that bright, Tiff.
Candidly Tiff
@tify330
·
283d
@ChrisCuomo I will look our for when you say the same about Republicans
Christopher C. Cuomo
@ChrisCuomo
·
283d
Crockett is a legit player in her party ... BUT - silly personal shots in a game of character assassination didn't work for them and won't. Have better ideas that serve the majority. That is what the country needs and may best respond to
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar
·
283d
Crockett: "He went from being the dork that was jumping around on stage to allegedly being this amazing genius that's gonna save this entire country. A country he wasn't born in and a country that maybe he doesn't agree with the idea of a democratic republic, considering the fact…

The statement by @ChrisCuomo constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to political discourse and character assassination in politics. The reply by @MissCoelan and the subsequent response by @ChrisCuomo also engage in public discourse as they discuss the implications of equating certain terms and the role of race in political analysis.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @ChrisCuomo acknowledges a mistake, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does address a sensitive issue related to race, which requires careful consideration.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by acknowledging a mistake, but it also challenges the basis of the criticism, which may not fully promote empathy and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue and acknowledges a mistake, but it also challenges the criticism, which could be seen as constructive criticism rather than a personal attack. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement explicitly acknowledges a mistake, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+2]