Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by Graham addresses a public issue related to funding for ICE and the urgency of the situation, indicating a preference for a legislative approach. It reflects engagement in public discourse as it discusses government funding and policy decisions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on legislative preferences and funding needs.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on procedural aspects of funding.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to address a public funding issue, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by ensuring government operations are funded. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing a public funding issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.