Art Vandelay
@1thirstypretzel
·
227d
The statement is part of a heated exchange on social media regarding the U.K.'s Investigatory Powers Act and its implications for U.S. companies. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, with the use of profanity and personal attacks. The intent appears to be to challenge and criticize the laws and the involvement of U.S. entities in their creation, but it does so in a manner that is not conducive to constructive dialogue.
- The statement uses confrontational language and profanity, which can be considered harmful and not conducive to respectful discourse. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement includes personal attacks and dismissive language, which does not respect the dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is focused on confrontation rather than dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks and does not attempt constructive criticism or dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement engages in free speech, it does so irresponsibly by using inflammatory language and personal attacks. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.