The statement suggests a radical restructuring of the internet, indicating dissatisfaction with its current state. It implies a need for significant change, possibly due to perceived issues like misinformation, privacy concerns, or monopolistic practices.
- The statement does not directly promote harm but suggests a drastic approach, which could be seen as harmful if not carefully considered. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The call for rebuilding could promote understanding and improvement if it leads to constructive dialogue about internet reform. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could benefit from more constructive criticism and dialogue about specific issues.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.