william . neuheisel
@wneuheisel
·
226d
The statement critiques The Times for not linking public documents, suggesting it hinders reader engagement and transparency. It implies a need for better access to information, aligning with broader discussions about media practices and public access to information.
- The statement aims to highlight a practice that may harm public access to information, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By promoting understanding of the issue, it encourages empathy towards readers who seek access to information. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of The Times' practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.