Republicans against Trump
@RpsAgainstTrump
·
279d
The statement engages with public discourse by addressing the actions and implications of a public figure, Enrique Tarrio, and the broader context of the January 6 Capitol riots. It questions the alignment with the Proud Boys and implies criticism of their actions and the pardon they received.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of the Proud Boys, which could be seen as harmful to their reputation. However, it is based on their actions and public perception.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but does criticize a public figure and group based on their actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical and somewhat accusatory. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism but rather poses a rhetorical question and makes an accusatory statement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question and criticize public actions and figures, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.