Jim Bornholdt 🇨🇦
@jim_bornholdt
·
278d
The statement is part of a broader conversation about public figures, law enforcement, and political groups, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is somewhat skeptical and acknowledges the difficulty of discerning truth in online interactions. The intent seems to be to agree with a point made about anonymity in online discussions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but acknowledges the challenge of verifying information online, which can contribute to misinformation if not handled carefully.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in direct attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does acknowledge a valid point about online anonymity.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone in the dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.