Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by Kshama Sawant constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues such as labor rights, union leadership, and political actions. It critiques the response of labor leadership to actions by political figures and calls for mass strike action, which are substantive public issues.
- The statement calls for mass strike action, which could be seen as a form of protest. While it does not directly harm, the tone is confrontational and could incite tension, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize public figures, which is a common aspect of public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on rallying action and critiquing leadership. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the UAW President and political figures, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for labor rights and political action, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political stance, aligning with the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.