Dr David Berger, aBsuRdiSTe cROnickLeR
@YouAreLobbyLud
·
278d
The statement criticizes Joe Rogan and Woody Harrelson for their comments on AZT, a drug used in the treatment of AIDS, suggesting they exhibit ignorance. The tone is critical and aims to challenge their views on a public health issue.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but criticizes public figures for their views, which could be seen as a form of harm if not done constructively. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but is critical of public figures, which is generally acceptable in public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not appear to offer constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks, as it labels the individuals as 'willfully ignorant.' [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to challenge public figures' views on a public health issue, which can contribute to public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the critique could be improved. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.