Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement expresses dissatisfaction with the United States' vote against a UN resolution condemning Russia's invasion of Ukraine. It critiques the effectiveness of UN resolutions and suggests a pressure campaign is influencing decisions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses frustration with the situation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism of the UN and the US decision. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the UN and the US vote but does not engage in personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.