Anna Paulina Luna
@realannapaulina
·
277d
The statement criticizes a lack of transparency from the Department of Justice regarding the release of certain files, while also highlighting the irony of seeking information on a platform known for misinformation. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to draw attention to perceived issues with transparency and communication from public institutions.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques the situation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for transparency, though it uses sarcasm which may not foster empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the DOJ's lack of response, but it does not engage in personal attacks, adhering to constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to call for transparency, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by holding institutions accountable. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to address a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.