Bret Baier

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 24

The statement critiques a change in how journalists are selected to ask questions of the President, suggesting it centralizes power rather than democratizes it. It engages in public discourse by addressing media access and transparency in government.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language but critiques a policy decision.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by explaining the role of the WHCA in press access. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses its platform to discuss the implications of changes in media access. [+1]