Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes a political figure for allegedly prioritizing corporate interests over public interests, expressing dissatisfaction with the current political party system. It uses strong language to convey frustration and calls for a government that serves the people.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in hate speech but could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and uses personal attacks, violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.