Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 12

The statement reports on a protest involving activists breaking a police line, with the intent to shut down a site they accuse of facilitating genocide. It uses strong language, indicating a serious accusation and a high level of tension.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially incite harm by using charged language like 'genocide,' which may escalate tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of those involved, as it labels actions as facilitating genocide without evidence presented. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language without fostering dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses strong accusations rather than encouraging dialogue. [-2]