The statement critiques the understanding of Wikipedia editors regarding the nature of fact-checking in journalism and the role of editors. It highlights issues related to media literacy and the evaluation of journalistic integrity, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as critical of Wikipedia editors. It maintains a focus on systemic issues rather than personal attacks, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the complexities of journalism and fact-checking, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Wikipedia editors' understanding without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss media literacy, which is a responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.