The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the credibility and sourcing of information related to political figures and media coverage. It uses sarcasm to refute claims of biased information selection, implying skepticism about the integrity of the sources and processes involved.
- The statement uses sarcasm, which may undermine constructive dialogue, but it does not directly cause harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but it does use derogatory language ('bootlicker') which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by using derogatory language, which detracts from constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.