The statement suggests a need for improved metrics to evaluate Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), questioning the adequacy of IQ as a measure. This engages with public discourse on AI development and evaluation.
- The statement does no harm and raises a valid point about the limitations of current measures for AGI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by questioning existing metrics and suggesting the need for better evaluation methods. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue on the topic of AGI measurement. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.