Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement is dramatic and sensational, focusing on a confrontation between political figures. It uses strong language like 'excoriated' and 'smackdown,' which suggests a confrontational tone. The statement implies criticism of a public figure's actions in a political context, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement uses confrontational language, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, using language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on conflict. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for a more sensational approach. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.