Reposted by Bret Baier
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
253d
The statement discusses the transparency of policy-making and the involvement of the public in real-time debates, contrasting it with traditional closed-door methods. It reflects on the implications of such transparency, suggesting it can be unnerving but also inclusive.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies a critique of traditional methods, suggesting a preference for transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by highlighting the shift towards public involvement in policy discussions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It uses the platform to discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of transparent governance. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.