Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the inconsistency in U.S. foreign policy towards Russia and Iran, which are significant public issues. It highlights a perceived double standard in international relations and invites discussion on the rationale behind U.S. engagement strategies.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents an observation about foreign policy, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by pointing out inconsistencies in policy, which can foster empathy and compassion for those affected by these policies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting a perceived inconsistency without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss foreign policy issues with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.