The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of media credentialing and its impact on journalistic freedom and speech. It argues that media professionals should not be intimidated by credentialing processes and should remain aggressive in their reporting. The statement also highlights concerns about the potential for content blocking, which touches on broader issues of free speech and media access.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but its dismissive tone towards those who feel intimidated could be seen as lacking empathy.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in dialogue about media practices but does so in a confrontational manner, dismissing concerns as 'whining' rather than engaging constructively.
[-2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating for aggressive journalism without reliance on credentials, but it could use a more responsible tone.
[+1]