Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement critiques an individual's actions and qualifications, specifically targeting Vance's perceived ineptitude and background. It references a public issue related to international agreements and ceasefire guarantees, which suggests engagement in public discourse.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses derogatory language ('stunt,' 'ineptitude') to describe Vance's actions, which could be seen as harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Vance, as it includes a personal attack by mentioning Vance's admission to Yale Law as a 'DEI admit,' which could be interpreted as undermining his qualifications. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on personal attacks rather than addressing the substance of the disagreement. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.