Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses a strong opinion on economic and social issues, specifically criticizing a billionaire's influence on Social Security and framing it as class warfare. It uses emotive language to highlight perceived injustices against the working class. The accompanying image and headline about military aid to Israel may suggest a contrast between domestic and foreign policy priorities.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in personal attacks but does generalize about the superwealthy, which could be seen as lacking respect for individual dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of perceived economic injustices but does so in a divisive manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using charged language that may hinder productive discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.