Jill Stien

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score 6

The statement appears to be a critique of an unnamed individual, likely a public figure, suggesting that their actions were motivated by self-interest, specifically to avoid investigations and protect financial interests. The tone is accusatory and implies misconduct or unethical behavior.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially harm the reputation of the individual being criticized, as it accuses them of unethical behavior without providing evidence.Ā [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual, as it makes serious accusations that could be considered defamatory if unsubstantiated.Ā [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on personal attacks rather than addressing specific actions or policies.Ā [-2]