The statement reflects on the necessity of tolerating hate as a default in public discourse, in response to a comment about a political figure's speech. It engages with the broader issue of how public figures are perceived and the role of hate in political dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but reflects on the negative aspect of hate being a default, which can be seen as acknowledging harm in discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does acknowledge the presence of hate in public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on the negative aspect of hate. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by acknowledging the reality of hate in discourse, but it does not actively use the platform to promote responsible dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.