The statement engages in a discussion about cancel culture and free speech, suggesting that public reactions are a form of crowd-sourced consequence. It implies that those who support free speech should accept differing opinions, even if they disagree.
- The statement does not directly harm but discusses the consequences of public reactions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by explaining a perspective on cancel culture. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to discuss societal issues like free speech and cancel culture. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds free speech by advocating for dealing with differing opinions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.