Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the owner of the Dakota Access Pipeline for allegedly making a harmful comment about activists and highlights a legal case involving Greenpeace. It emphasizes the indigenous-led nature of the Standing Rock protests, countering claims made in the lawsuit.
- The statement highlights a potentially harmful comment, which could be seen as promoting harm against activists. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of indigenous activists by acknowledging their leadership in the protests. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying misinformation about the protests' organization. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of the pipeline owner but does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.