The statement criticizes Twitter as a platform and comments on a specific incident involving Edward Cagney Mathews, who engaged in racist harassment. The tone is critical and dismissive towards those defending Mathews, suggesting that only the 'worst' people would do so. The statement links to a video of the incident, which has sparked significant public reaction.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language to criticize defenders of Mathews, which could be seen as divisive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on a public incident and not engaging in hate speech or harassment itself. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses a group of people as 'the worst.' [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a dismissive tone towards those in disagreement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its dismissive and divisive tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.