Joanna Rogers
@joannarobertsro
·
2d
The statement by Chris Cuomo constitutes public discourse as it engages with a societal issue, specifically addressing racism and public reactions to a racially charged incident. Cuomo's comment suggests that Twitter should focus on clear-cut cases of unacceptable behavior, referencing a specific incident of racial harassment.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of nuanced discussions by suggesting Twitter should only focus on clear-cut cases.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does reference a situation involving harassment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the complexity of discussions around racism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as dismissive of those who might have differing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, but it does so in a way that may not foster constructive dialogue.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as not using the platform responsibly by oversimplifying complex issues. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.