Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue concerning free speech and immigration, specifically the deportation of a Green Card holder for protesting. It suggests a viewpoint-driven action against the individual, implying a violation of free speech rights. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived injustices.
- The statement aims to do no harm by advocating against what it perceives as an unjust action. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the issue of free speech and its implications. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the actions taken against the protester. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses the platform to advocate for societal betterment by defending free speech rights. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by discussing the importance of protecting protest rights. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.