Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses the revocation of a green card and its implications on free speech, which is a public issue. It suggests a debate on immigration policy and freedom of expression.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful if it suggests using immigration status as a tool against free speech. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and could be interpreted as a personal attack or threat. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to address a public issue but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.