Reposted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
The statement is a critique of a proposed bill and its potential implications, specifically focusing on how former President Trump might use the authority granted by the bill. It expresses a clear stance against the bill and indicates an intention to vote against it, engaging in public discourse by addressing a legislative issue and its potential impact on states.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by attributing negative intentions to a political figure without evidence. This could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does attribute negative intentions to a public figure, which could be seen as a minor violation of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a hypothetical scenario to criticize a political figure, which could be seen as a minor violation of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, but the use of strong language could be seen as a minor violation of using the platform responsibly. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.