Reposted by Bret Baier
Josh Kraushaar
@JoshKraushaar
·
124d
The statement involves a discussion about a public figure, Mahmoud Khalil, and his association with a controversial group, CUAD, which is involved in a significant public issue related to Israel and Palestine. The conversation references a claim about CUAD's stance on violence, which is a substantive engagement with public discourse.
- The statement indirectly associates Khalil with a group that allegedly endorses violence, which could be seen as harmful if not accurately represented. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it could impact Khalil's dignity if the association is misleading. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it highlights a controversial and potentially inflammatory aspect of CUAD. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a critical view without offering a platform for Khalil's perspective. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to highlight a controversial issue, but it should ensure accuracy and fairness to maintain integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.