The statement questions the notion of success in media, particularly when it involves creating division, and suggests a need to evaluate the audience and messaging. It engages with public discourse by addressing the societal issue of media influence and its impact on public dialogue.
- The statement does not directly harm others but critiques a broader media practice, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by encouraging reflection on media practices and their societal impact, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning media practices, the statement uses influence to potentially better society, aligning with the principle of using influence positively. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning media practices, aligning with the principle of using a platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.