Ron DeSantis

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 11
3/19/2025, 11:22:37 AM
X
In reply to:
Kostas
@Highline7
·
163d
@RonDeSantis How would such a bill pass? Need 60 in the senate.
Ron DeSantis
@RonDeSantis
·
163d
Congress has the authority to strip jurisdiction of the federal courts to decide these cases in the first place.

The sabotaging of President Trump’s agenda by “resistance” judges was predictable — why no jurisdiction-stripping bills tee’d up at the onset of this Congress?
Chip Roy
@chiproytx
·
164d
Lots of noise about impeachment. We must study every ruling & act accordingly w/ everything on the table (noting: 14 Dem votes required in Senate.). But, more fertile ground… 1) House can pass a resolution stating there is/was an invasion, 2) we can defund radical courts.

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a discussion on legislative strategies and the authority of Congress concerning federal court jurisdiction. The conversation touches on significant public issues such as judicial authority, legislative processes, and political strategy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on legislative strategy rather than personal attacks or harmful rhetoric.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a dialogue about legislative strategy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the topic at hand. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a legitimate public issue, contributing to civic dialogue. [+1]