The statement expresses support for the removal of mandatory diversity statements in hiring, viewing it as a victory for free speech advocates. It suggests concern about the potential replacement of this requirement with another form of mandatory speech.
- The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for freedom of expression and against mandatory speech. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a broader discussion about free speech and diversity requirements. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the potential for new forms of mandatory speech without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.