The statement engages in a discussion about free speech and censorship, particularly in the context of social media suspensions. It argues against labeling certain speech as incitement unless it meets a high standard, referencing historical political actions to support its point. The tone is defensive and critical, with a focus on protecting free speech even for those with unpopular opinions.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by advocating for a high standard before labeling speech as incitement, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks, though it uses strong language ('major league assholes').Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of censorship practices, aligning with the principle of engaging in dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to argue for the betterment of society by advocating for free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by arguing against censorship without due cause. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.