Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a legal decision regarding voting rights in New York City, framing it as a significant event for American elections. It reflects a perspective on citizenship and voting rights, engaging in public discourse about electoral policies.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as divisive depending on one's perspective on voting rights.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without engaging with opposing perspectives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but lacks constructive dialogue with those who may disagree. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.