Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement criticizes ICE's actions regarding a Venezuelan asylum seeker, highlighting potential misjudgments in identifying gang affiliations. It raises concerns about human rights and due process, suggesting that the evidence used by ICE is flawed and that the individual is suffering as a result.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by ICE's actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm.Ā [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of the individual by focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks.Ā [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes empathy by drawing attention to the plight of the asylum seeker.Ā [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of ICE's methods without resorting to personal attacks.Ā [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for better treatment of asylum seekers, aiming for societal improvement.Ā [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.