Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
·
233d
The statement questions the legality and ethical considerations of banning Big Pharma advertising, suggesting a need for legal scrutiny beyond mere approval of the idea. It challenges the audience to consider the implications of supporting a ban based solely on personal approval rather than legal standards.
- The statement encourages careful consideration of legal standards, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by ensuring actions are legally sound. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By prompting a discussion on legal and ethical standards, it promotes understanding and critical thinking. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue by questioning the basis of support for the ban, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses the platform to encourage a thoughtful examination of policy implications, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.