Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement suggests skepticism about Jeffrey Goldberg's involvement in a national security conversation and implies a conspiracy theory regarding the origins of Covid-19. It questions the official narrative and hints at alternative explanations, which can contribute to public discourse by challenging mainstream views.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies distrust and conspiracy, which can indirectly cause harm by spreading misinformation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it questions the integrity of individuals and institutions without evidence, which can undermine dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it fosters skepticism and distrust. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it implies a conspiracy without providing evidence or engaging with opposing views. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question official narratives, but it does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it lacks evidence and promotes conspiracy theories. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.