The statement discusses the ethical obligations of journalists in relation to a specific incident involving a journalist receiving sensitive information. It questions the integrity of journalists who claim they would leave such a situation and highlights the actions of a reporter who alerted someone about the information. The tone is skeptical and somewhat accusatory, suggesting that journalists may not always act ethically.
- The statement questions the ethical behavior of journalists, implying they might not act with integrity, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not disclosing specific private details but questions the ethical obligations of journalists in handling private information.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of journalists' ethics but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.