The statement criticizes Bloomberg's article on Substack, using strong language to express disapproval. It suggests Bloomberg is advocating for censorship on Substack to make it more palatable for mainstream audiences.
- The statement uses harsh language, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the tone is dismissive.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and resorts to personal attacks, calling the piece 'pathetic.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.