Christopher C. Cuomo

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -81
4/1/2025, 4:44:11 AM
X
In reply to:
Luis Martinez 
@LuisMartinezGIF
·
232d
@ChrisCuomo @AtaloBarlow @realDonaldTrump @NewsNation Although your answer is correct, that's pathetic, Chris. A retiree with too much time on his hands claiming you're left-wing and hate Trump is enough to get you riled up. Hating Trump isn’t shameful, it’s understandable. These toxified people are those who Trump loves.
Christopher C. Cuomo
@ChrisCuomo
·
232d
@AtaloBarlow @realDonaldTrump @NewsNation Chooch, I say here that he is right to go to the White House because conversation is the cure ...you are so toxified by partisanship you can't even read anymore
ATB2003
@AtaloBarlow
·
232d
Truth be told Chris Cuomo @ChrisCuomo is back to his CNN days where he hates @realDonaldTrump you don’t believe me watch his !@NewsNation show and you’ll see it. He thinks he coming across as giving us the News but in reality he is not and @NewsNation is becoming a Left wing
NewsNation
@NewsNation
·
235d
.@BillMaher is slated to join President Trump for dinner at the White House. He joins @ChrisCuomo and says that while the conversation will not “heal America,” it is time to “stop shouting from 3,000 miles away.”

More: https://www.newsnationnow.com/po…

Full interview:

The statement critiques the nature of online political discourse, suggesting it is dominated by 'keyboard warriors' and not reflective of broader societal issues. It implies that the real problem lies in the divisive and confrontational nature of such discussions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but highlights the negative impact of online discourse.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by pointing out the superficiality of online arguments. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue without personal attacks. [+1]